Peace For the World and the Middle East
A New United Nations for a New Time
WHAT THE GLOBAL PLAN SHOULD BE For the United Nations to MOVE FORWARD is a Preliminary PLAN, PLAN A and PLAN B;
PLAN "B" is to implement PLAN "A" and for the betterment of the Current United Nations overall. The objective of Plan "B" is to dissolve the United Nations like the League of Nations was after WW2 as being ineffective to deal with post WW2 problems.
The current United Nations needs to be dissolved for the same reasons as ineffective to deal with lingering post WW2 and post Cold War problems; which must be more inclusive and a more democratic United Nations since it’s inception. This New United Nations has to be reflective of it’s growth and it’s current limited power to solve real world issues effectively.
The New United Nations (N.U.N.). The N.U.N Security Council would not have any “single” Veto Vote from the permanent members if they still exist. ALL Security Resolutions must pass by 2/3 of the current 15 member panel, OR if there is a Veto Vote it must be "Unanimous" by all 5 permanent members; or a Veto can not take place. Single Veto votes must be abolished to move forward.
The exception to the Security Council Requirement to pass any "binding resolution" is a N.U.N “Ultra Super Majority (USM)” of 80 percent or 4/5ths of the total member countries in the (N.U.N.) General Assembly whether all are present or not. Currently this would be 4/5 rule of 193 making it 155 countries which could in theory effectively Over-Rule ANY Security Council resolution if the General Assembly so wished, including admitting new or abolishing current members.
Also the New U.N. would need teeth of various kinds including compulsory military, police and civil services provided by Member Countries for deployment. Military, Police and Civil assets with command personnel provided to the New U.N. by member states that are under command and control of the Secretary General and Staff of the U.N. with the power to arrest and detain any person on the planet to bring them to, or before any court, this maybe a expanded power of INTERPOL under control of the U.N., ICJ (International Court of Justice) and ICC (International Criminal Court)
There has to be a binding Plan "A" attempt to first to facilitate the "Preliminary Plan" below first to make Plan "A" viable
This "Preliminary Plan" must encourage Hamas to quit with the condition they pack up and leave to another country for permanent political asylum somewhere else and NEVER RETURN if some country would take them. This "Preliminary Plan" MUST be binding in the U.N. Security Council and be supported by the ICC, ICJ and Israel. Israel must be forced to sign it with the condition of Plan "A" below to make this possible. If Plan "A" is not achievable then proceed directly to Plan "B" and promote a Global Boycott of Israel without pause until Plan "A" is achieved.
Again; PLAN "B" above is for a New United Nations (N.U.N) to make the world workable again and implement Plan "A" .
PLAN "A": After first recognizing the 1967 borders without settlements to the original Green Line of Resolution 242 and the land returned, without wanting destruction of existing structures and infrastructure for the first stage of a Palestinian State, then on to one Pluralistic State in the future; providing the entire West Bank and Gaza are set aside for ethnic/indigenous Palestinians only, much like reserves are for the North American indigenous people are. (No zones or settlers anymore).
( Newly added paragraph to postulate upon ) If the state of Israel refuse this eventual pluralistic one state solution with the 1967 Green lines as a Palestinian reserve, then the alternative is a two state solution borders that are then based on U.N. Resolution 181 of 1947, which is what they originally agreed to in 1949 with resolution 194; the link is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_194
This solution is administered by military force upon Israel, due to the fact the 1967 war was unprovoked. It should also be noted Israel attacked first in the 1967 war Egypt did not; and now the Zionists wish no further compromise for Peace in the Middle East in conflicts instigated and provoked by them since 1948 and prior. Resolution 242 “the green line” was the compromise for the final two state solution this has been ignored and blocked by them in spades, by placing zones and settlers there, now they have to pay the piper; or if Israel refuse to force West Bank settlers to leave in relation the resolution 242 Green Line area with a infrastructure and buildings intact this will re trigger Resolution 181, 1947 border implementation as oppesed to the resolution 242 Green Line. If the Zionists continue to refuse further, THEN ALL of Israel’s air power and air bases are and Iron dome systems are taken out and allied ground invasion takes place to rectify a historic wrong and historic suffering and all Zionists are expelled to other countries. The choice is theirs. ( End of Newly added paragraph to postulate upon. ) A foot note: If Iran or another country or entity takes advantaged of Israel or others in the region during the immediate aforementioned process they will be eliminated as a country or entity.
Further to the aforementioned; A right way for Israel to continue to exist without boycotts would be the concept of a G-7 and G-20 advocated peaceful co-existence and the U.N. creation of one bi-national pluralistic Jewish-Arab commonwealth with a new flag from the River to the Sea for the 21st century and beyond; instead of the continuation of a Nationalistic Apartheid Theocratic State of those backwards times.
Perhaps the state of Palsrael would be a good name for the new U.N. created state, using the current U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a starting point for a pluralistic State Constitution separate from all Religion and the Concept of a God or a Deity in government and in the Construction of it’s Laws; But with respect to ALL private worship and beliefs and the preservation of Historical and Holy Sites; along with the banning of right and far right parties on any side, similar to what was done in Nazi Germany and other Fascists countries from that time frame to make life and coexistence possible for all.
Settlers and other Israeli Citizens that have committed direct acts of violence and promoted violence towards Palestinians have to permanently leave the county and NEVER to return just like Hamas and other Islamic groups; sparingly some indivduals may only return after a significant period of time if full confessions are obtained through a polygraph with the results made public and then they maybe Conditionally Pardoned.
Then their own National Day for Truth and Reconciliation and new flag day; a day like CANADA and South Africa has done and is trying to do.
Else Humanity will NEVER move forward.
1. Two Attachments explain Zionism in microscopic detail;
2. This Attachment is likely my favourite song that inspired me to write the aforementioned. I hope this song will inspire you to; as I will be that ghostly image that you see out of the corner of your eye; and when you look there, there will be nothing there, but a shadow of what once was, HOPE; but now there is none.
As now; Lobby Groups, The Misguided, The Brain Washed, The Self Entitled, The Donor Class, The Despots, The Dictators, The Religious & soon to be Far Right Fanatics and The Evangelicals now Rule the World, or at the very least control it in some way or twisted fashion, and everything in it, including Free Speech, Freedom of the Press or Freedom to Demonstrate, it does seem this way in one form or another;
True Freedoms & Rights of Self Determination and a True Country that actually serves “We The People” in every Nation on Earth is now just a memory of what once was; and HOPED upon, but now it is just faint glimmer far off in the distant past, never to return as the wick burns to its end to be no more.
How can Fundamental Freedoms or Rights be given or taken away? They are yours, and can not be given or taken away by any Law, Religion, Country, Region, State, Province, Oblast or Okrug; as it is not for them to decide upon, but for you to decide privately upon, within yourself; Providing it does not harm others within the context of the U.N. Convention of Human Rights, as the State of Isreal and the Zioinist continues to do.
Only People and the Environment have a right to exist, Kingdoms, Countries, States, Provinces, Beliefs, Cultures and the Self-Entitled do not, don’t let anyone tell you differently, as it is the very nature of why a revolution is sometimes born.
Governments are meant to serve honestly and faithfully the entire population and provide for them, whomever or whatever kind of Person or Part of the Environment that maybe, when they do not they have NO Right To Exist.
Democracy is NOT about voting some in, its about removing someone from power, it took this long for Joe Biden to get this, and Donald Trump will never get this.
(ADDED): In a perfect world ALL leaders regardless if elected to office or not or the head of their party or stutucture of goverment would be limited to 10 total years and could not hold any kind of public office past 75 years of age regardles off country or political or court system. (END)
The very purpose of a strong third party, is to bring compromise and good governance, where every voice can be heard, something America is yet to clue in on. Minority Governments are good in a Parliamentary System and Three Strong Parties would be good in a Congressional System as well. If a third is too far to the right then have a fourth too far to the left - every voice needs to be heard no matter how crackers it may sound. In the terms of a presidential race a run-off till there is only two to decide upon.
In a U.S. Presidential System it would be if every state is a “Purple” state like Maine and Nebraska with NO Gerrymandering - all delegates into one “purple” basket; as opposed to continuing with first past the post state by state, as it is unconstitutional as it voids one person one vote right making voting for any minority or second party in certain states moot.
The current Electoral College System is one of the last vestiges of Slavery still in the Constitution Of The United States - so the system is de-facto unconstitutional, regardless of what any court may say. Imagine if Canada or Australia or any other parliamentary system country had first past the post by Province or by Region instead of by riding? How ridiculous the United States is.
Two attachments on how to get away with murder in Israel
The Truth About Arab Jews
(Part 3 below)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/11/01/native-americans-right-to-vote-history/
Last Week Tonight With John Oliver Season 11, Episode 18 - taken down by Zionists
July 28, 2024: The West Bank Settlements
Could Israel Become a FAILED State? | Aaron Bastani Meets Ilan Pappe - 1:21:24
https://www.aljazeera.com/program/unmute/2024/12/4/renowned-jewish-academic-arrested-after-pro-palestinian-speech
https://www.aljazeera.com/program/unmute/2024/5/28/ilan-pappe-on-being-censored-for-pro-palestine-stance
https://www.aljazeera.com/program/unmute/
Many different issues are touched in this article, and a lengthy statement to differ likely does not help with anything. I would like to emphasize that in thermodynamics, the world is going to maximal entropy -- maximal variations, disorder, etc. Human civilization, however, is built on ordering. Putting wood studs and rocks in proper order can build a house. Burning iron ore with coke can give us raw iron before further refinement. And iron is about the very basis of all things "modern". Then people build tribal structure, countries, then League of Nations, and UN.
But the world is still fundamentally an unordered place. Even inside the better organized, the cultivated garden, there are still disorder. See all the LGBTQ activities now overflows from many media channels. They even captured the Olympics. Ordering, comes from somebody forcefully arrange something. Luckily wood studs and stones do not complain. But if your kids come to mess up the specific order, then you have to rework and drive them away as they don't understand the ordering as yet. Now what if somebody wants to build a company by arranging people and dictate how things are done ? it is fine as long as people work for him on their own will.
But how about a government want to rearrange people's lives because they think looking from the top, they would get a better "ordering" ? This can be as small as city council mandates every house must have two flower pots at the front (as in some areas of Switzerland) or as big as government conscripts you son into army to fight in Vietnam for a cause you do not support. Dr. Sun Yat-Sen said that human rights do not come from God. Instead, people's right comes from fighting. Only when the peasants hit the nobleman into bleeding would he agree to a lighter tax. Kings have to get their heads cut off to realize that a parliament composed of elected representatives from the people. Kings certainly did not agree at first. Only when enough heads rolled, democracy started to flourish. Chinese Communist head Mao said "Political power comes from the barrels of the guns." it is simply more naked and brutal than what Dr. Sun had said, but it is essentially the same meaning.
The British would still have an American colony today if the Americans did not gang up and bought guns and shoot the British soldiers. And they got shot at and died too.
Before Hitler, there were already endless empires fighting each other, looting left and right, massacre at will. A single farmer could not do anything. Even if they gang up and build their own fortress, it usually did not work at the end. The salvation always come from somebody far away, outside of or at the fringe of the imperial power, able to organize an army with people who are not afraid to die, and sufficient replacement and armament, to start rebellion. That was how Mongolian empire and its various branch Khanates were gradually destroyed, from different rebellions, at different times. Eventually, the Mongolian Empire becomes only a legend in the books, and modern Mongolia is nowhere close.
Hitler was able to conquer most of the Europe, it eventually took two powers to defeat his regime: Russians o n the east and American/British on the west. Statistically speaking, it was the Red Army who broke the back of the German army. By the time Americans landed on the Normandy beach, four allied armies fought against two German armies, later three when Holland was included. The size of the conflict on the east is probably four times as big. So outside forces have to be counted on to help the defeated countries to get their houses back. In the ancient days, these defeated kings would have to pay heavily for the armed help they get. European countries pay by playing vassals for USA all the time up to now. And European politicians are still fighting for the US interests when their farmers are complaining about directives coming from Brussel (the EU).
If the League of Nations was too weak to be effective, then UN seemed to be more effective because of Korean War. But Korean War is really an American war with some side shows by other countries. The same UN played totally as servants when Israelis evict Palestinian families from their houses past midnight, losing their house, heir dates tree, their cows, their land. But UN has a tent and food waiting for them. It is really US playing the role to soften the harsh actions of the Israelis. The problems cited for the old UN are really rooted that UN was designed as a vehicle to serve US interests. Russian interests was sometimes served, as Russian delegates rarely veto anything unless it is directly related to Russian interests. UN does not appear to be powerful enough to solve the middle east conflict, frankly, because USA is not powerful enough to solve the middle east conflicts. In addition, the Arab world simply do not trust USA being sincere. They call USA the Great Satan for some good reasons.
People in China call Russians the people of fighting. Not because Russians like to invade other countries, including China, during the late Manchurian dynasty and the early days of the Republic of China. The admiration is about how Russians defended their countries in the last 200 years. Russian soldiers, even as they curse the Czar, still fought bravely and stubbornly until the Bolshevik Revolution. After fighting against USA for global hegemony, crashed in 1991, and now rebuilt by Putin, Russians show they still can fight (Ukraine war is considered a civil war in Russia, and I agree with them) If some Ukrainians really want to have their own country, then they have to fight. They did fight, but more importantly, they coerced people would be equally happy as Russians to fight for them while the Banderalists act as the black shirts and shoot those who fall back. For some Ukrainians who really believe they will be better off as part of Russia, they fight as well, as resistance behind enemy lines for Russian Forces. All those devastating long range attacks deep inside Ukraine territory is possible only because of these resistance fighters detect and report the location of important targets. Some attacks may require laser light markers shined onto the targets, etc.
Ordering things takes energy. Keep things in order also takes energy. Creating peace requires fighting. There is no such thing as permanent peace. When the old men die, their memory, lessons of a life time, are gone with them. In general, very little is passed down to the next generation. So every 80-90 years, people would have to relearn certain lessons. Our situation today is closer to WW1 eve than WW2 eve. Remember that most people in most countries were enthusiastic about the war. A new UN cannot resolve such problems. A more powerful UN would become just a super-sized EU, with more power, and more capable of creating havoc than bureaucrats of Brussel. 160+ countries. It is not realistic to have USA one vote, and Tonga one vote as well. Some order can be achieved by such global organization. But peace can be kept more through out regional alliance. The reason is people closer to a problem tend to have better understanding of the problems, and usually more skin in the game. At the UN level, most countries have no skin in the game when Japan invaded China in 1937. USA provided trade sanctions and diplomatic pressure. Finally Japan attacked Peral Harbor. The way to acquire peace ? Fighting all the way to the Tokyo Bay.
I studied wars since I was 11. I have never experienced one, but I think I can comprehend the trauma caused by war. Unfortunately there is no way out. Leave it to the nature, then all things will go maximal entropy (a measure on extent of variations) Keeping your garden in order is an everyday effort. Losing one day's work is enough to make a difference to the more careful eyes. For the earth with 7 billion people and without sufficient natural resources to keep all them properly fed, clothed, housed, and have meaningful lives no matter how much effort we put in. Mathematically there is no such resource, my lord. So war is inevitable. If you want to keep order, you need to dispense energy, and use energy wisely.